Propulsion

Dual-mode propulsion from a single green propellant tank

CubeSat33 uses ASCENT — an ionic liquid green monopropellant — to feed both a chemical thruster and electrospray thrusters. One tank, two thrust profiles, less mass wasted on dual systems.

How it works

Two modes, one feed system

Dual-mode means the bus can switch between high thrust and high efficiency without carrying two complete propulsion architectures.

Chemical mode

High thrust · fast response

ASCENT is fed to a catalytic monopropellant thruster. Decomposition produces relatively high thrust for rapid orbit changes, collision avoidance, or phasing into a better ground track.

  • ·Quick delta-v for time-critical maneuvers
  • ·Useful when electrospray alone would take too long

Electrospray mode

High efficiency · long dwell

The same ASCENT is fed to electrospray thrusters. High voltage extracts and accelerates charged droplets and ions, producing low thrust with very high specific impulse for station-keeping and fine control.

  • ·Fuel-efficient weeks-to-months of persistence
  • ·Matches CubeSat power budgets better than many EP options

Chemistry

ASCENT ionic liquid chemistry

ASCENT (formerly AF-M315E) is a hydroxylammonium-nitrate-based ionic liquid monopropellant. One fluid stores chemical energy for catalytic decomposition and carries mobile ions for electrospray extraction.

An ionic liquid is a salt that stays liquid near room temperature. ASCENT is built from energetic ions rather than a classic neutral hydrazine molecule. That is why the same tank can support two very different thruster types: decompose it for chemical thrust, or extract charged species for electric thrust.

Energetic oxidizer salt

Hydroxylammonium nitrate (HAN) supplies oxygen-rich chemistry through nitrate anions paired with hydroxylammonium cations.

Fuel salt + water

An energetic fuel salt and controlled water content form a stable, handleable liquid with density suited to small spacecraft tanks.

Ionic conductivity

Mobile ions make the liquid electrically usable for electrospray, while low vapor pressure keeps it practical in vacuum.

Chemical path

Catalytic decomposition

In chemical mode, ASCENT contacts a preheated catalyst bed. The energetic mixture decomposes into hot gas products that expand through a nozzle. No separate oxidizer tank is required — the monopropellant already carries both the oxygen-rich and fuel-side chemistry in one liquid.

  • ·High thrust relative to electrospray
  • ·Lower toxicity handling profile than hydrazine
  • ·Requires clean feed lines and reliable catalyst thermal control

Electric path

Field extraction electrospray

In electrospray mode, a strong electric field at micro-emitters pulls charged droplets and ions from the liquid surface. Those charged particles accelerate in the electric field, producing very low thrust with high specific impulse for long station-keeping burns.

  • ·Uses the same ASCENT tank after pressure step-down
  • ·Water and volatiles must be managed for stable spray
  • ·Best for efficient dwell, not rapid large orbit changes

Why one chemistry enables dual-mode

Chemical thrust

Energetic nitrate-based salts that release heat and gas over a catalyst

Electric thrust

Ionic liquid conductivity and low vapor pressure for electrospray extraction

Shared tank

One storable liquid instead of hydrazine plus a separate electric propellant

CubeSat packaging

Dense liquid storage without high-pressure noble-gas tanks

Green means lower toxicity than hydrazine — not zero hazard. Feed cleanliness, materials compatibility, and thermal design still decide whether dual-mode works in flight.

Comparison

ASCENT vs hydrazine

Hydrazine is the proven monopropellant baseline. ASCENT trades decades of heritage for lower toxicity, higher density, and a path to dual-mode chemical + electrospray from one tank.

AspectHydrazineASCENT
ChemistryNeutral molecular monopropellant (N₂H₄)HAN-based ionic liquid monopropellant
Toxicity & ground opsHighly toxic; specialized ranges and heavy PPE commonMuch lower acute toxicity; still hazardous, easier facilities
Density / packaging~1.0 g/cm³ class — more tank volume for the same massHigher density — more impulse in CubeSat volume
Flight heritageDecades of thrusters, processes, and failure dataGrowing green-monoprop line; dual-mode still maturing (GPDM)
Dual-mode (chemical + EP)Not a practical shared electrospray propellantIonic conductivity enables chemical + electrospray from one tank
When you pick itMaximum heritage; hydrazine range already availableSafer handling, denser packaging, dual-mode architecture

Prefer hydrazine when

  • You need maximum thruster heritage and known failure modes
  • Your program already has a hydrazine-qualified range
  • Risk budget is “do not invent the propellant architecture”
  • You only need chemical monoprop — not shared electrospray

Prefer ASCENT when

  • Safer ground handling matters more than decades of heritage
  • CubeSat volume favors denser propellant packaging
  • You want chemical burns and efficient EP from one fluid
  • You can accept maturing dual-mode flight data (GPDM baseline)

Neither is free. Both need catalyst thermal control and clean feed systems. Dual-mode ASCENT adds pressure step-down and electrospray power electronics that a pure hydrazine monoprop system does not carry — complexity spent to free payload mass elsewhere and open safer ops.

Propellant in the bus

ASCENT as the shared medium

Green monopropellant

ASCENT is a lower-toxicity alternative to hydrazine for chemical thrusters — safer ground handling for smallsat teams.

Ionic liquid behavior

Because ASCENT is an ionic liquid mixture, it is compatible with electrospray extraction, enabling the dual-mode architecture.

Single tank benefit

Sharing tankage, valves, and feed plumbing reduces mass and volume compared with separate chemical and EP systems.

Flight path

Baselines the NASA GPDM demonstration

The Green Propulsion Dual Mode (GPDM) mission is the first integrated chemical + electrospray ASCENT system on a 6U CubeSat class vehicle — the practical reference for CubeSat33.

ElementGPDM referenceCubeSat33 intent
Form factor6U demonstration3U–6U operational bus
Chemical thruster~100 mN class monopropFast maneuvers when needed
ElectrosprayMIT iEPS-class unitsEfficient station-keeping
PropellantShared ASCENT tankSame dual-mode architecture

CubeSat33 is not affiliated with NASA, MIT, Rubicon, or the GPDM team. GPDM is cited as public technology context only.

Trade-offs

Honest constraints

Pros

  • One propellant path for two mission regimes
  • Lower mass/volume than dual independent systems
  • Green propellant handling vs classic hydrazine
  • Mission flexibility without reconfiguration launches

Cons

  • Still maturing as a combined flight architecture
  • Electrospray thrust is low — large moves take time
  • Feed-system thermal and cleanliness design is critical
  • Power and thermal budgets remain CubeSat-constrained